|YOU ARE HERE: Home > Drink Driving Facts > History of UK Drink Driving Laws|
Drink Driving Motoring Law
Drink Driving Law & Motoring History
Some key dates and information on drink driving laws & motoring in the UK
The year of 1872
1872 Licensing Act
In 1872 it became an offence to be drunk while in charge of carriages, horses, cattle and steam engines!! The penalty for which was a fine not exceeding 40 shillings OR at the discretion of the court, imprisonment with or without hard labour for a term not exceeding one month.
The Year of 1896
British Motor Industry Begins
January 14th 1896 saw the formation of Daimler Motor Company Ltd. This was the UK's first serial production motor car company. They produced 89 vehicles in the first 8 months of production from their site in Coventry. The british motor industry had officially begun!
The Year of 1899
First FATAL motor CAR accident in Britain
The year of 1899 saw the first fatal motor car accident in Britain. The rear wheel of a 6HP Daimler collapsed and two men named Edwin Sewell and Major Richer were thrown from the vehicle and died as a result. The accident happened on Grove Hill in Harrow.
The year of 1925
1925 Criminal Justice Act
In 1925 it became an offence to be found drunk in charge of ANY mechanically propelled vehicle on any highway or other public place. The penalty for which was a fine not exceeding 50 pounds and/or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 4 months as well as a disqualification from holding a driving licence for a minimum period of 12 months.
the year of 1930
1930 Road Traffic Act
In 1930 it became an offence to drive, attempt to drive or be in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or any other public place while being "under the influence of drink or a drug to such an extent as to be incapable of having proper control of the vehicle". No legal drink driving limit was set until 1967.
the year of 1960
1960 Road Traffic Act
In 1960 it became an offence to drive, attempt to drive or be in charge of a motor vehicle on a road or other public place while "unfit to drive through drink or drugs". No legal drink driving limit was set until 1967.
the year of 1962
1962 Road Traffic Act (aka the Marples Act)
In 1962 it became an offence for any person to drive, attempt to drive or be in charge of a motor vehicle if their "ability to drive properly was for the time being impaired". No legal drink driving limit was set until 1967.
The possibility of using blood, urine or breath for alcohol analysis was approached in the Road Traffic Act of 1962 (aka The Marples Act), however, it was not considered to be an offence to fail/refuse to supply a breath, blood or urine specimen. Failing to do so without reasonable cause could 'be treated as supporting any evidence given on behalf of the prosecution, or as rebutting any evidence given on behalf of the defence'.
Before this act was introduced successful drink driving prosecutions relied heavily upon the subjective tests and observations of so called 'police surgeons' and other evidence such as witness statements and any statements made by the accused.
the year of 1964
Accidents, Alcohol and Risk study
A study entitled Grand Rapids Effects Revisited: Accidents, Alcohol and Risk funded by the US public health service and the Licensed Beverage Industries of New York that was carried out in 1964 found that 80mg of alcohol in 100ml of blood was the level at which the chances of being involved in a crash rise sharply for most drivers.
the year of 1965
UK Government prepares to introduce new drink driving lIMIT
The UK government announced that it was preparing to introduce a maximum legal blood alcohol limit for drivers (drink driving limit). This move came as a result of the increase of road traffic accidents involving drivers who had been drinking alcohol.
The year of 1967
Introduction of the Legal Drink Drive Limit
The Road Safety Act of 1967 introduced the first legal maximum blood alcohol (drink driving) limit in the UK. The limit was set at a maximum BAC (blood alcohol concentration) of 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood or the equivalent 107 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of urine. It became an offence to drive, attempt to drive or be in charge of a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration that exceeded the maximum prescribed legal limit.
Failing to provide 'EVIDENTIAL' specimen becomes an offence
The Road Safety Act of 1967 also made it an offence for 'A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to provide a specimen for a laboratory test'. Any person who failed to provide an evidential blood or urine specimen for a laboratory test without reasonable excuse could be proceeded against and punished as if the offence charged were an offence of either driving, attempting to drive or being in charge of a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration above the prescribed legal limit.
Introduction of the Roadside breathalyser
In 1967 the breathalyser act was given royal assent. Transport minister Barbara Castle introduced the breathalyser as a way of testing a person's BAC (blood alcohol concentration) level at the roadside. The act stated that the breathalyser device must be one that is type approved by the government. People protested to the introduction of the breathalyser and claimed that it was an infringement of their personal liberties, especially publicans, many of which claimed impending bankruptcy.
Roadside breathalysers provided the police with a portable hand-held device that enabled them to carry out on the spot breath tests at the roadside, the tests gave a reliable indication of a motorists BAC (blood alcohol concentration) level. However, these devices did not provide readings that could be used as hard evidence and a basis for prosecution in a court of law (and most still don't to this day). They were used for screening purposes as a means to decide whether or not a motorist was arrested and subsequently required to give an evidential urine or blood sample at the police station. These screening roadside breath tests are known as PBT's or preliminary breath tests.
Failing to provide a specimen of breath becomes an offence
The Road Safety Act 1967 made provisions so that any person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to provide a specimen of breath for a preliminary breath test is guilty of an offence and is subjected to arrest without warrant and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £50.
The year of 1968
First breathalyser is type approved
The first preliminary roadside breathalyser to be type approved by the home office was the Alcotest 80, manufactured by Dräger Ltd. The number 80 in the name refers to the BAC (blood alcohol concentration) limit it was designed to detect.
The introduction of the breathalyser in the UK, along with a heavy government run advertising campaign helped decrease the percentage of road traffic accidents where alcohol had been a factor from 25% to 15% in the first year. There were 1,152 fewer recorded deaths, 11,177 fewer serious injuries and 28,130 fewer slight injuries caused by road traffic accidents.
the year of 1981
1981 Transport Act Introduces Evidential Breath Testing
The 1981 Transport Act introduced evidential breath testing and stated that 35 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath (equivalent to 80mg of alcohol in 100ml of blood) was to be the legal limit.
Although the act introduced evidential breath testing law, it was not actually established and implemented until 1983. This was due to the various tests and trials that were currently being carried out on evidential breath testing machines and the need for manufacturers of these machines to produce, test and check large quantities for wide scale distribution and implementation. The police force also needed to train its officers in their use to ensure correct procedure was always followed, this also took a considerable amount of time.
The statutory option
The 1981 Transport Act stated that motorists that provided a breath test reading of up to 50 microgrammes of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath or less could have the statutory option of providing a blood or urine sample (whichever the police officer specified) instead. This statutory option was introduced to help provide confidence in the reliability and accuracy of evidential breath testing machines.
The Year of 1983
EVIDENTIAL BREATH TESTING IS PUT INTO PRACTICE
1983 seen the introduction, type approval and implementation of the Lion Intoximeter 3000. The Lion Intoximeter 3000 was an evidential breath testing machine which provided much more accurate and reliable results than the portable breathalyser devices police used at the roadside for preliminary breath testing. The readings these machines produced could be used as a basis for prosecution and hard evidence in a court of law!
Of course, the introduction of these machines caused much controversy as to how accurate the readings were. However, the readings they produced, were scientifically proven to be very accurate and evidential breath testing, to this day, remains to be the principal means of testing a drivers BAC (blood alcohol concentration) level in order to help secure drink driving related convictions in a court of law.
High Risk Offender Scheme
1983 also saw the introduction of the High Risk Offender (HRO) scheme. Intended to manage convicted drink drivers who could possibly have an alcohol problem. Drivers who fall into this category need to satisfy the DVLA that they do not have or have overcome a drink problem before they will be issued with a driving licence. This is achieved by attending a DVLA medical and providing a blood sample.
High Risk Offenders are drivers who:
In 1991 the high risk offender scheme was extended to cover drivers who fall into the categories above and in addition to cover drivers who:
The year of 1991
New drink driving offence introduced
The Road Traffic Act of 1991 introduced a new offence of 'Causing death by driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs' which carried a compulsory prison sentence of up to five years.
Drink Driving Rehabilitation Courses Introduced
Section 30 of the Road Traffic Act 1991 introduced a provision for sentencing courts to refer those who are disqualified for drink driving offences to approved drink driving rehabilitation courses. The main aim of these courses is to educate offenders in order to help prevent re-offending. Completing the drink driving rehabilitation course can reduce any disqualification period by up to 25% and can help reduce car insurance premiums for convicted drivers.
Drink driving rehabilitation courses were in the experimental stages only and were not adopted nationwide until the year 2000.
The Year of 2000
Drink Driving Rehabilitation Courses Adopted Nationwide
With effect from January 1st 2000, a nationwide scheme was implemented that enabled all courts across the UK to be able to refer convicted drink drivers to the drink driving rehabilitation course.
The year of 2002
Most serious drink drive offenders must sit extended re-test
As of 2002, drivers convicted of causing death by driving when under the influence of alcohol or drugs are required to pass an extended test before being allowed to drive again.
In 2002 doctors were also given the right to take blood samples from unconscious or incapacitated drivers without their consent. Even though a blood sample can be taken while a driver is incapacitated or unconscious, once the driver regains consciousness, he must give consent for that sample to be analysed. Failure to allow a specimen to be subjected to a laboratory test when "driving or attempting to drive" is an offence.
The year of 2004
Maximum sentence increased for drink driving offence
The maximum penalty for causing death by driving when under the influence of alcohol or drugs was increased to 14 years in 2004.
The year of 2005
Evidential roadside breath testing law
In 2005 police officers were given the power to require evidential breath specimens elsewhere than at the police station. Section 154 of The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 made amendments to The Road Traffic Act 1988. These amendments granted police officers the power to require drivers to provide an evidential breath specimen at or near any place where a preliminary breath test was, or would have been so administered but for an individuals failure to co-operate with it.
Police officers were granted the power to administer evidential breath tests at the roadside, in practice however, they were unable to exercise this power as no roadside evidential breath testing device/s had yet been type approved.
The year 0f 2008
Comprehensive breath testing statistical data collected
In 2008, The Department for Transport funded every police force in England and Wales in order to buy newly approved, memory equipped roadside screening breath testing devices. These screening devices are able to collect and store data electronically which can then be transferred to a central database. The data they can store includes the age and gender of any driver required to take a preliminary breath test alongside the date and time; the reason for the test and the test result. Comprehensive statistical data on drivers who are below the legal limit and their involvement in any accident starts being collected for the first time in history.
The year 0f 2010
DRINK DRIVING LIMIT, LAWS AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK UNDER REVIEW
Government efforts to improve road safety, reduce fatalities and combat drink driving continue. A report commissioned by the Department for Transport (Dft) carried out by Sir Peter North CBE QC reviews the legal framework in Britain for both drink and drug driving. The review was requested by the Rt. Hon. Lord Adonis (former Secretary of State for Transport) in order for the Government to examine possible changes to current legislature and the legal framework governing drink and drug driving in the UK.
The various acts covering drink driving and the law are constantly evolving as the government continues to clamp down on drinking and driving.
THE YEAR OF 2013
Government clamps down on high risk offenders
Government amends and introduces new legislation specifically targeting drink drivers who are classified as 'High Risk Offenders'. The new legislation came into force on 1st June 2013.
Disqualified drivers classified as 'High Risk Offenders' are required to satisfy the DVLA (Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency) of their fitness to drive upon expiration of their driving disqualification by attending and passing a DVLA medical examination. This is in place to help detect if a person is alcohol dependent and/or misuses alcohol and helps ensure if they are, they are kept off the road due to the increased chance of them re-offending.
Prior to June 1st 2013 the majority of people disqualified from driving who were classified as high risk offenders retained legal entitlement to drive once their disqualification had expired and before they had attended and passed a DVLA medical examination if a qualifying driving licence application had been received by the DVLA.
This was seen as a loophole in the system by many and the DVLA stated they had evidence that suggested many high risk offenders were abusing the system by delaying their medical examinations in order to continue legally driving despite the fact they may not have been deemed fit to drive by DVLA medical standards.
Section 88 of The Road Traffic Act 1988 Amended
Section 88 of The Road Traffic Act 1988 was amended for this reason and new legislation requires that as of 1st June 2013, all disqualified drivers classified as high risk offenders MUST attend, pass and satisfy the DVLA of their fitness to drive before they will be issued with a driving licence and be legally entitled to drive again.
High Risk Offender Scheme Extended
Section 74 of The Motor Vehicle (Driving Licences) 1999 act was also amended and the high risk offender scheme which requires medical investigation for drivers convicted of certain drink driving related offences was extended to include:
Any person convicted of the aforementioned offence as of the 1st June 2013 will be classified as a high risk offender requiring medical investigation into their fitness to drive.
Road Safety Minister, Stephen Hammond commented on the new legislation stating:
"Drink drivers are a menace and it is right we do everything we can to keep the most high risk offenders off the road".